Paper No. 35
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MYRON E. ESSEX,
TUN-HOU LEE,
WOAN-RUCH LEE
and
CHUN-NAN LEE
______________
Appeal No. 95-2419
Application 07/850,7701
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the final rejection of claims
1 through 14. As clarified at page 2 of the Supplemental Examiner's Answer (Paper No.
31, August 27, 1998), claims 1 through 10, 13 and 14 are now allowed. This leaves claims
1Application for patent filed March 13, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007