Ex parte ESSEX et al. - Page 4




                Appeal No. 95-2419                                                                                                          
                Application 07/850,770                                                                                                      


                                We have discovered that selectively deglycosylated HIV-1 envelope                                           
                        proteins retain their ability to support viral infectivity, implying that they                                      
                        generally retain the native envelope conformation.  We also noted that the                                          
                        envelope protein of the related simian virus for African green monkeys                                              
                        (SIV     ), which is not pathogenic to its natural host, has fewer N-linked                                         
                              AGM                                                                                                           
                        glycosylation sites, particularly in the C-terminal portion of the surface                                          
                        envelope protein analogous to gp120.  Without wishing to bind ourselves to                                          
                        a specific detailed molecular explanation, we propose that a selectively                                            
                        deglycosylated HIV-1 envelope protein is more effective in eliciting a                                              
                        protective immune response in people.  Glycosylation serves to reduce or                                            
                        prevent immunological recognition of envelope protein domains.  Selective                                           
                        deglycosylation enables an immune response to these domains and                                                     
                        improves the opportunity for a protective immune response.  Deglycosylation                                         
                        which produces substantial conformational changes (as determined by loss                                            
                        of infectivity) should be avoided.                                                                                  
                Allowed claim 1 is directed to selectively deglycosylated HIV-1 envelope proteins as                                        
                                                  2                                                                                         
                described in this paragraph.                                                                                                
                        As seen from claims 11 and 12, these claims require more than claim 1, i.e., the                                    
                claims are directed to a “vaccine.”  As explained on pages 4-8 of the Supplemental                                          
                Examiner's Answer, the examiner's position is that one skilled in the art at the time of the                                
                present invention would have reasonably doubted whether the selectively deglycosylated                                      
                HIV-1 envelope proteins set forth in claim 1 on appeal would function as a “vaccine.”  We                                   
                agree that the facts of record support the examiner’s conclusion.                                                           




                        2   The examiner has incorrectly stated at page 2 of the supplemental examiner's answer that                        
                claim 1 was amended on August 8, 1994 to recite three sentences.  While the appendix to the Appeal Brief                    
                filed on that date contained an incorrect copy of claim 1, the record copy of the claim is properly written as              
                a single sentence.                                                                                                          
                                                                     4                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007