THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DEEPAK MAHULIKAR, JACOB CRANE
and ABID A. KHAN
________________
Appeal No. 95-2500
Application No. 07/984,1471
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, GRON and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed November 24, 1992.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/809,081, filed December 9, 1991, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/663,340, filed February 27, 1991, now abandoned; which is a
division of Application No. 07/359,305, filed May 31, 1989,
now U.S. Patent No. 5,015,803, issued May 14, 1991.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007