THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 43
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte THOMAS R. COVEY, ERIC HUANG
and JACK HENION
__________
Appeal No. 95-2726
Application 07/994,4771
__________
HEARD: MARCH 9, 1999
__________
Before GRON, ELLIS and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 USC § 134 of the final
rejection of claims 1 through 8, all the claims pending in the
application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on
1Application for patent filed December 21, 1992.
According to the appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/354,617, filed May 19, 1989,
now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007