Paper No. 59
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte KATSUMI KANEKO
and TAKESHI MAEDA
______________
Appeal No. 95-2746
Application 07/887,3941
_______________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 11, 1999
_______________
Before WARREN, WALTZ and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 15-
Application for patent filed May 21, 1992. According to appellants,1
this application is a continuation of Application 07/668,697, filed March 7,
1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/423,247, filed
October 18, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007