Ex parte KANEKO et al. - Page 6




            Appeal No. 95-2746                                                                           
            Application 07/887,394                                                                       


            19-27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Matsuo in                                   
            view of Oikawa and van Montfoort.                                                            
            It is understood that appellants in their Brief have                                         
            separately argued the patentability of dependent claims 16 and                               
            27.  In contrast to appellants' position, our decision is                                    
            based upon issues which, in our analysis, are common to and                                  
            shared by each of the claims before us.  Accordingly, we do                                  
            not find it                                                                                  
            necessary to separately discuss claims 16 and 27.  We will,                                  
            therefore, substantially confine our discussion to that of                                   
            claim 15.                                                                                    
            Matsuo teaches a gas phase adsorptive process wherein                                        
            the adsorptive material is an active carbon fiber, column 3,                                 
            line 39-40.  The active carbon fiber may be prepared from                                    
            petroleum pitch fiber, column 5, lines 32-42, and in                                         
            particular, line 37. Matsuo teaches neither the specific                                     
            surface area, nor the oxygen content required by claim 15.  In                               
            this respect, we do not agree with the examiner's position                                   
            that the adsorption of ozone at a concentration of 1 ppm,                                    
            Matsuo, Table 5, bridging columns 11 and 12, would inherently                                
            produce the oxygen content required by claim 15.  Compare the                                
                                                   6                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007