Ex parte KANEKO et al. - Page 4




            Appeal No. 95-2746                                                                           
            Application 07/887,394                                                                       


            fiber with oxygen-containing functional groups and an oxygen                                 
            content of about 3 to about 18% by weight based on the weight                                
            of the fiber.                                                                                

                                           THE REFERENCES                                                
                  The references of record relied upon by the examiner are:                              
                                                                                                        
            Matsuo et al. (Matsuo)               4,046,525                Sept. 6, 1977                  
            van Montfoort et al.                                                                         
            (van Montfoort)                      4,111,842                Sept. 5, 1978                  
            Oikawa et al. (Oikawa)               4,831,011                May  16, 1989                  

                                           THE REJECTIONS                                                
            Claims 15 and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                                         
            first paragraph.  Claims 15-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                  
            § 112, second paragraph.                                                                     
            Claims 15-17 and 19-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                          
            § 103 as being unpatentable over Matsuo in view of Oikawa and                                
            van Montfoort.                                                                               


                                                OPINION                                                  
            We will not sustain the rejection of claims 15 and 28                                        
            under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.  The examiner states                                 
            that the term, "basic gas," is undefined.  Although, “basic                                  
            gas” is defined only by example to ammonia, the term is                                      

                                                   4                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007