Ex parte KANEKO et al. - Page 2





            Appeal No. 95-2746                                                                           
            Application 07/887,394                                                                       



            29, which are all of the claims in the application.2                                         





                                            THE INVENTION                                                

            The invention is drawn to a gas phase adsorption process                                     

            wherein a pitch-based oxidized activated carbon fiber having a                               
            specific surface area of 200 to 2500 m /g, oxygen containing2                                             

            functional groups and an oxygen content of about 3 to about                                  

            18% by weight based on the weight of the fiber is contacted                                  

            with a gas phase containing water vapor or basic gas such as                                 

            ammonia to adsorb the water vapor or basic gas.  Claim 15 is                                 

            illustrative and reads as follows:                                                           

                  15.  In a gas phase adsorption process in which a gas                                  
            phase containing water vapor or a basic gas is brought into                                  


                  2  The Notice of Appeal refers to the decision February 10, 1994 of the                
            Primary Examiner finally rejecting Figures 5-7. The date of the final                        
            rejection is December 30, 1993, not February 10, 1994. The examiner's Advisory               
            Action was mailed on February 7, 1994, and presumably received by appellants                 
            on February 10, 1994. Entry of a proposed drawing correction for Figures                     
            5-7, improperly referred to in the Notice of Appeal, a procedural matter,                    
            was properly resolved by petition. The Final Rejection, Paper No. 29, dated                  
            December 30, 1993, the examiner's Advisory Action, Paper No. 31, dated                       
            February 7, 1994, Appellants' Brief, Paper No. 37, dated May 26, 1994, and                   
            the Examiner's Answer, Paper No. 38, dated July 18, 1994, maintained and                     
            addressed respectively the rejection of claims 15-29. Since the record before                
            us, including a properly filed Appeal Brief was directed throughout to claims                
            15-29, it appears that any error present was harmless.  Accordingly, the                     
            substantive rejections of claims 15-29 are before us for consideration.                      
                                                   2                                                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007