Appeal No. 95-2914 Page 7
Application No. 07/447,969
examiner, we find ourselves in agreement with appellants that
the aforementioned rejections are not well founded.
Accordingly, these rejections will be reversed. In view of
the above, we find it unnecessary to reach or discuss the
rebuttal evidence furnished by appellants.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims claims 1-6, 28, and 32-34 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Holmberg I or II each in view of any
of Ovshinsky I, Ovshinsky II, or Kanai; and to reject claims
9, 10, 29-31, 36 and 39 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Holmberg I or II each in view of any of
Ovshinsky I, Ovshinsky II, or Kanai as above further in view
of Cook is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007