Appeal No. 1995-3257
Application 08/056,382
Claims 6-9, 11, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35
U.S.C. ' 102(b) as being anticipated by Balsari I or II.2
Decision
In rendering our decision, we have considered the
following:
The entire specification and record in 08/056,382;
Final Rejection (paper no. 5, mailed December 13, 1993);
Brief (paper no. 13, filed August 8, 1994);
Examiner's Answer (paper no. 17, mailed November 18,
1994);
Supplemental Examiner's Answer (paper no. 19, mailed
November 29, 1994);
Reply Brief (paper no. 20, filed January 17, 1995);
2nd Supplemental Examiner's Answer (paper no. 21, mailed
March 7, 1995);
Remand to Examiner (paper no. 24, mailed May 23, 1995);
and,
2We have combined the rejections that were separately presented in the
examiner's answer:
Claims 6, 7, 9, 11, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 102(b) as being anticipated by
Balsari I.
Claims 6, 7, 9, 11, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 102(b) as being anticipated by
Balsari II.
Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 102(b) as being anticipated by Balsari I or II.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007