THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSEF MANSER, FRIEDRICH EGGER and
WERNER SEILER
____________
Appeal No. 95-3861
Application No. 08/115,4531
____________
HEARD: April 9, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed September 1, 1993.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/862,729, filed April 3, 1992, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/381,730, filed July 5, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 5,126,159,
issued June 30, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007