Appeal No. 95-3861 Application No. 08/115,453 This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 24 through 32 which are all of the claims pending in the present application. Claims 24 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows: 24. Apparatus for the production of dough with a gluten framework, including the production of paste dough from starch and protein containing raw materials including flour, middling or semolina, comprising: a) a metering unit for the metering of all liquid and dry components; b) two-shaft kneading means having two synchronously running and self-cleaning shafts for kneading said dough without the application of molding pressure and for forming the gluten framework in a continuous through process; c) a single-shaft screw press receiving said dough from said kneading means, including means for homogenizing said dough and applying pressure thereto, in order to press said dough into a desired shape; and d) means for transferring the dough from said two-shaft kneading means to said single shaft screw press without any pressure build-up in said kneading means and without causing temperature rise of the dough. The underlined claim phrases are means-plus-function language to which we must apply the statutory provisions of 35 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007