THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ALAIN PETIT, ROLAND BACHELARD,
RENE CLAIR and YVES CORREIA
________________
Appeal No. 95-4216
Application 08/035,0761
________________
HEARD: APRIL 5, 1999
________________
Before OWENS, WALTZ and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 17 and 19-28 as amended after final rejection and claim
1Application for patent filed March 22, 1993. According
to appellants, the application is a division of Application
07/990,939, filed December 14, 1992, now U. S. Patent No.
5,243,111, issued September 7, 1993, which is a continuation
of Application 07/720,642, filed June 25, 1991, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007