Ex parte PETIT et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 95-4216                                                                                   
             Application 08/035,076                                                                               


             29 which was added after final rejection.  These are all of                                          
             the claims remaining in the application.                                                             
                                                THE INVENTION                                                     
                    Appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward an                                           
             oxychlorination catalyst composition which includes an                                               
             oxychlorination catalyst, a specified amount of catalytically                                        
             and chemically inert solid diluent particles, and a solution                                         
             or suspension of a catalytically active copper compound.                                             
             Claim 17 is illustrative and reads as follows:                                                       
                    17. An oxychlorination catalyst composition comprising                                        
             immixture of (a) a catalytically effective amount of an                                              
             oxychlorination catalyst, (b) a diluent comprising particles                                         
             of a catalytically and chemically inert solid substance, which                                       
             diluent is present in an amount ranging from 1 to 20 times by                                        
             weight of the oxychlorination catalyst (a), and (c) a solution                                       
             or suspension of a catalytically active copper compound.                                             
                                                THE REFERENCE                                                     
             Cowfer et al. (Cowfer)         4,339,620         Jul. 13, 1982                                       
                                               THE REJECTIONS                                                     
                    Claims 17 and 19-29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                            
             § 102(b) as being anticipated by or, in the alternative, under                                       
             35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Cowfer.                                                        
                                                    OPINION                                                       


                                                       -2-2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007