Paper No. 54
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte SAIED ZANGENEHPOUR
______________
Appeal No. 95-4899
Application 08/131,0291
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed October 4, 1993. According to appellant,
this application is a continuation of Application 07/918,892, filed July 16,
1992; which is a continuation of Application 07/657,969, filed February 20,
1991; which is a continuation of Application 07/292,189, filed December 30,
1988, all abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007