THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RONALD P. MARX
_____________
Appeal No. 1996-0208
Application 08/098,1531
______________
HEARD: July 15, 1999
_______________
Before CAROFF, JOHN D. SMITH and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
1Application for patent filed July 28, 1993. According to
applicant, the application is a division of Application No.
07/884,302, filed May 11, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,249,946,
issued October 5, 1993, which is a continuation of Application
No. 07/666,618, filed March 8, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007