Appeal No. 1996-0208
Application 08/098,153
Initially, we note that while Dowd appears to describe a
“retrofit” application (column 3, lines 35-39) in that Dowd’s
invention “may be operatively integrated with a prior art
plate forming machine . . . ,” Dowd contains no teaching or
suggestion that his “improvement over the prior art” should be
further modified by any additional retrofitting operations.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007