Ex parte PIGNATELLO - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1996-0270                                                        
          Application 08/118,128                                                      


               Appellant claims a method for decontaminating soil which               
          contains an organic compound having at least one oxidizable                 
          aliphatic or aromatic functional group, by contacting the soil              
          with a recited ferric chelate and a peroxide compound in the                
          presence of water at the pH of the soil.  Claim 1 is                        
          illustrative and reads as follows:                                          
               1.  A method for decontaminating soil containing an                    
          organic compound having at least one oxidizable aliphatic or                
          aromatic functional group comprising contacting the soil with               
          an active, soluble ferric chelate selected from the group                   
          consisting of ferric nitrilotriacetate and ferric                           
          hydroxyethyleniminodiacetate and a peroxide compound in                     
          amounts effective to achieve oxidation of the soil                          
          contaminating compound in the presence of water at the pH of                
          the soil.                                                                   
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Pignatello                   5,232,484              Aug. 3,                 
          1993                                                                        
          Yunfu Sun et al. (Sun), “Chemical Treatment of Pesticide                    
          Wastes.  Evaluation of Fe(III) Chelates for Catalytic Hydrogen              
          Peroxide Oxidation of 2,4-D at Circumneutral pH”, 40 J. Agric.              
          Food Chem. 322-27 (1992).                                                   
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1-5, 8-10 and 19-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Sun in view of Pignatello.                 
                                       OPINION                                        

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007