THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CRAIG HACKL
and TED KOELLING
_____________
Appeal No. 1996-0351
Application 08/075,7401
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1 through 6, 8 through 10, 12 through
14, 19, 20, 22 and 23 which are all of the claims remaining in
the application. Subsequent to the final Office action dated
1Application for patent filed June 11, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007