Ex parte HACKL et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-0351                                                        
          Application 08/075,740                                                      


               (b) subjecting the immersed pickle stock to a vacuum                   
          treatment for a period of time not exceeding one minute;                    
               (c) subjecting the immersed pickle stock to a pressure                 
          treatment for a period of time not exceeding one minute; and                
               (d) repeating the vacuum treatment.                                    
               22.  A method of curing pickle stock consisting                        
          essentially of the steps of:                                                
               (a) immersing the pickle stock in a curing liquid;                     
               (b) subjecting the immersed pickle stock to a vacuum                   
          treatment for a period of time not exceeding one minute;                    
               (c) subjecting the immersed pickle stock to a pressure                 
          treatment for a period of time not exceeding one minute; and                
               (d) repeating the pressure treatment.                                  
               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies on the                 
          following prior art:                                                        
          Winkler et al. (Winkler)           4,789,558                Dec.            
          6, 1988                                                                     
               Claims 1 through 6, 8 through 10, 12 through 14, 19, 20,               
          22 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable              
          over the disclosure of Winkler.                                             
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have                       
          carefully reviewed the specification, claims and applied prior              
          art, including all of the arguments advanced by both the                    

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007