THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENNETH B. HIGGINS and
THOMAS E. AUSTIN
____________
Appeal No. 96-0596
Application No. 08/069,887 1
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before METZ, PAK, and WALTZ , Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 through 6, 8
through 11, 13 through 15, 17 through 23, 25 and 27 (answer,
1Application for patent filed June 1, 1993. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/660,296, filed February 22, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007