THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 48
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEVIN SCHOCH
____________
Appeal No. 96-0734
Application No. 08/056,7391
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 5
through 8, 10, 17 through 22, 26 and 30 through 36. Claims 23
1Application for patent filed April 30, 1993. According
to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/849,796, filed March 11, 1992, which is a continuation
of Application No. 07/514,649, filed April 25, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007