Appeal No. 96-0734 Application No. 08/056,739 through 1111, and for the polling station 101 to collect the messages from the stations. Citta is concerned with peak upstream loading in a two- way cable television (CATV) contention system. During upstream retransmissions by subscriber terminals 11 to CATV headend 12, a transmission window time (Figure 5) is a function of the upstream message traffic load. In other words, the number of attempts by subscribers 11 to retransmit to the CATV headend 12 is directly related to the upstream transmission window size time (Figure 5; column 7, lines 23 through 37). Based upon the foregoing, we agree with appellant (Brief, page 13) that "[t]he patents, when viewed alone or in combination, fail to suggest any incentive for a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the data terminals to transmit an unsuccessful attempt count to the terminal mapping means or to modify the terminal mapping means to remap based on an unsuccessful attempt count instead of the time it takes to collect all available messages during a probing cycle." In summary, the obviousness rejection of claims 5 through 8, 10, 26 and 30 through 36 is reversed. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007