Ex parte SCHOCH - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-0734                                                          
          Application No. 08/056,739                                                  


          number of terminals and predetermined minimum number of                     
          terminals, each data terminal being adapted to respond, if                  
          having a data message to transmit, to a polling signal made to              
          the group to which the data terminal is mapped;                             
               wherein an unsuccessful attempt occurs when two or more                
          data terminals within a terminal group attempt to transmit                  
          data messages in response to a given polling signal;                        
               wherein each data terminal maintains a count of the                    
          number of unsuccessful attempts it has made for each data                   
          message transmission and transmits this count to the terminal               
          mapping means when each data message transmission is                        
          successfully completed; and                                                 
               wherein the terminal mapping means changes the number of               
          terminals in a group and the number of groups in response to                
          the last count of the number of unsuccessful attempts to                    
          transmit a data message that it received from a data terminal.              
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Haas et al. (Haas)            3,755,781                Aug. 28,             
          1973                                                                        
          Brophy et al. (Brophy)        4,071,908                Jan. 31,             
          1978                                                                        
          Hopkins et al. (Hopkins)           4,161,786                July            
          17, 1979                                                                    
          Citta                         4,528,663                July  9,             
          1985                                                                        
          Cotie et al. (Cotie)          4,667,193                May  19,             
          1987                                                                        
               Claims 5 through 8, 10, 26 and 30 through 36 stand                     
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                   
          Brophy in view of Citta.                                                    
               Claims 17, 18, 21 and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007