Ex parte SCHOCH - Page 7




          Appeal No. 96-0734                                                          
          Application No. 08/056,739                                                  


               The obviousness rejection of claims 17 through 22 is                   
          reversed because the teachings of Haas, Hopkins and Cotie                   
          cannot cure the noted shortcomings in the teachings of Brophy               
          and Citta.                                                                  
                                      DECISION                                        
               The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 5 through                
          8, 10, 17 through 22, 26 and 30 through 36 under 35 U.S.C. §                
          103 is reversed.                                                            
                                      REVERSED                                        




                    KENNETH W. HAIRSTON                )                              
                    Administrative Patent Judge   )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                  ) BOARD OF PATENT                   
                    JOHN C. MARTIN                     )     APPEALS                  
                    Administrative Patent Judge   )       AND                         
                                                  )  INTERFERENCES                    
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                    ANITA PELLMAN GROSS                )                              
                    Administrative Patent Judge   )                                   





                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007