THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEVEN C. CHARLTON
and MICHAEL J. WILCOX
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0783
Application No. 08/102,2971
____________
HEARD: November 15, 1999
____________
Before PAK, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 32, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
BACKGROUND
The appellants' invention relates to an analyte detection
method and device. An understanding of the invention can be
1Application for patent filed August 5, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007