THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THERESA G. TALBOTT and ALEX F. TALBOTT
____________
Appeal No. 96-0811
Application No. 08/023,9551
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS
and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 10 and 15 through 17 under 35
U.S.C. § 103. The only other claims still pending in the
application, namely claims 12 through 14, have been allowed.
1Application for patent filed February 26, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007