Ex parte TALBOTT et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 96-0811                                                          
          Application No. 08/023,955                                                  


          § 112. See In re Knowlton, 481 F.2d 1357, 1366, 178 USPQ 486,               
          492 (CCPA 1973). In the present case, it is inaccurate to                   
          state that the system to be used in a store includes the store              
          itself.                                                                     
               In summary, the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1                 
          through 10 and 15 through 17 is reversed, and a new ground of               
          rejection has been entered against claims 1 through 10 and                  
          claims 12 through 14 under the provisions of 37 CFR §                       
          1.196(b).                                                                   
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant              
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final               
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203              
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)). 37              
          CFR                                                                         
          § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not              
          be considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                       
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellants,                   
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    




                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007