THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte REINER WITKOWSKI, OTTO GANSTER,
HEINRICH KONIGSHOFEN and RALPH OSTAREK
__________
Appeal No. 96-1142
Application 07/939,1801
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, OWENS and ROBINSON, Administrative
Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 7-11, which are all of the claims remaining in the
1Application for patent filed September 2, 1992.
According to the appellants, the application is a division of
Application 07/641,980, January 16, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007