THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GREGORY S. VASCHE
____________
Appeal No. 96-1207
Application No. 08/064,2031
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and FRAHM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 13,
14, 16, 17 and 19 through 25.
The disclosed invention relates to an integrated circuit
device, and to a method of depositing a tunneling oxide layer
1Application for patent filed May 21, 1993. According to
the appellant, the application is a division of Application
No. 07/545,122, filed June 26, 1990, now Patent No. 5,219,774,
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/195,766, filed
May 17, 1988.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007