Appeal No. 96-1455
Application No. 08/218,279
person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention
was made to modify the instant prior art process to
automatically analyze the image rather than automatically
analyze the markings associated the image(s).
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 19-24 under
35 U.S.C. § 103.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 1-6 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 is reversed. The
decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-18 and 25 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed, and the decision of the Examiner
rejecting claims 19-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. The
decision of the Examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connec-tion with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
-22-
Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007