Ex parte PLUMTON - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1996-1616                                                         
          Application No. 08/158,673                                                   


          forming both the drain of a vertical field effect transistor                 
          and also the cathode of a diode.  Claim 1 is illustrative of                 
          the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                              

          1.   An integrated circuit, comprising:                                      
               (a) a vertical field effect transistor with a drain in a                
          first portion of a first layer of semiconductor material; and                
               (b) a diode with a cathode including a second portion of                
          said first layer and spaced from said first portion.                         
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                               
          Müller                        4,183,036                 Jan. 08,             
          1980                                                                         
          Yoshida et al. (Yoshida)            4,288,800                Sep.            
          08, 1981                                                                     
          Blanchard et al. (Blanchard)        4,896,196                Jan.            
          23, 1990                                                                     
          Korman et al. (Korman)        5,111,253                 May  05,             
          1992                                                                         
          Lüth                                5,122,853                Jun.            
          16, 1992                                                                     
               Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                   
          paragraph, as being indefinite.                                              
               Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being               
          anticipated by Blanchard.                                                    
               Claims 2 through 5, 7, and 8 stand rejected under 35                    
          U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Blanchard in view of                 


                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007