Ex parte PLUMTON - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1996-1616                                                        
          Application No. 08/158,673                                                  


          modification, it is unclear to us how Blanchard can continue                
          to disclose common doping profiles after the modification if                
          the whole transistor is different.  Accordingly, we will not                
          sustain the rejection of claim 8.                                           
                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               In summary, the decision of the examiner rejecting claim               
          6 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph is reversed.  The                 
          decision of the examiner rejecting claim 1 under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 102(b) and claims 2 through 4, 7, and 9 under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103 is affirmed.  The decision of the examiner rejecting                    
          claims 5 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                           





               The examiner's decision is affirmed-in-part.                           











                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007