Appeal No. 1996-1616 Application No. 08/158,673 modification, it is unclear to us how Blanchard can continue to disclose common doping profiles after the modification if the whole transistor is different. Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection of claim 8. CONCLUSION In summary, the decision of the examiner rejecting claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph is reversed. The decision of the examiner rejecting claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and claims 2 through 4, 7, and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed. The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 5 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. The examiner's decision is affirmed-in-part. 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007