Ex parte KNIFFIN et al. - Page 17




          Appeal No. 96-1657                                                          
          Application 07/819,345                                                      


          limited authorization is required and nothing is contemplated               
          about multiple authorization for multiple users as required in              
          accessing a real estate lockbox.  The second reference,                     
          Marian, has nothing to do with any kind of secure access                    
          system, but rather, deals with an electronic controller for                 
          sprinkler systems.  There may be numerous applications where                
          Marian’s device, having the capability of generating a single               
          paging signal containing plural control signals to control                  
          plural systems, can be used, however, there is no suggestion,               
          explicit or otherwise, that it can be combined with a single                
          lock system disclosed by Ryoichi.  The third reference,                     
          Henderson concerns the electronic real estate lockbox system.               
          The purpose of Henderson’s system is so different and diverse               
          from that of Ryoichi’s system that we find no reason to                     
          justifiably combine Henderson with Ryoichi.                                 





               The Federal Circuit has stated that “[the] mere fact that              
          the prior art may be modified in the manner suggested by the                
          Examiner does not make the modification obvious unless the                  
                                        -17-                                          





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007