Paper No. 11
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte OLE K. NILSSEN
______________
Appeal No. 96-1659
Application 08/166,9311
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed December 15, 1993. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application
08/004,598, filed January 14, 1993; which is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/860,234, filed March 27, 1992, now Patent No. 5,210,788,
issued May 11, 1993; which is a continuation of Application 07/627,189,
filed December 13, 1990; which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/562,897, filed August 6, 1990, now Patent No. 5,068,890, issued November
26, 1991; which is continuation-in-part of Application 07/397,266, filed
August 23, 1989, now Patent No. 5,070,522, issued December 3, 1991; which
is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/136,505 filed December 23, 1987,
now Patent No. 4,866,757, issued September 12, 1989; which is a continuation
of Application 06/921,381, filed October 22, 1986.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007