Ex parte NILSSEN - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-1659                                                          
          Application 08/166,931                                                      


          including a slave siren operative to sound an alarm in the                  
          presence of smoke; and (iii) by not including a battery; and                


               a third set of conductors connecting each set of slave                 
          input/output terminals with each other set of slave                         
          input/output terminals as well as with the set of master                    
          input/output terminals.                                                     
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Kabat et al. (Kabat)          4,429,299           Jan. 31,                  
          1984                                                                        
          Iwata                         4,468,655           Aug. 28,                  
          1984                                                                        
          Ferguson et al. (Ferguson)    4,673,920           June 16,                  
          1987                                                                        
          Watkins                       4,731,810           Mar. 15,                  
          1988                                                                        
          Claims 35-49, 53 and 55-68 stand rejected under 35                          
          U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, for failing to particularly                 
          point out and distinctly claim the invention.  Claims 35-41,                
          44-46 and                                                                   
          49-55 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                         
          unpatentable over the teachings of Ferguson in view of                      
          Watkins.  Claims 42, 43, 47 and 48 stand rejected under 35                  
          U.S.C. § 103 as unpatent-able over Ferguson and Watkins in                  
          view of Iwata.  Finally, claims 56-68 stand rejected under 35               



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007