Appeal No. 1996-1715
Application No. 08/068,592
teachings for the claimed steps lacking in Schwartz (see above
discussion of Lowry and Mathur), we cannot sustain the
rejection of claim 39 and all claims which stand or fall
therewith (claims 6, 7, 43, 44, and 46) over Schwartz, Lowry,
and Mathur.
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007