THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAZUHITO TSUTSUMI
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1758
Application No. 08/358,0501
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and RUGGIERO, Administrative
Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 3, 4, 10-14, 19, and 24-29. Pending claims 6-9
stand withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a
1Application for patent filed December 16, 1994.
According to the appellant, the application is a continuation
of application 08/026,111, filed March 1, 1993, now abandoned,
which is a continuation-in-part of application 07/774,103,
filed October 11, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007