Appeal No. 96-1999 Application 08/216,382 This panel of the board understands the examiner’s assessment of the Hubert patent relative to the claimed sub- ject matter, as set forth in the answer. However, for reasons explained, infra, we are not in accord therewith. At this point, we note that appellant seeks to adjust the rate of depletion of propellant from propellant tanks on a spacecraft to maintain attitude during velocity change (speci- fication, page 1). As stated by appellant (specification, pages 8 and 9) propellant is drawn preferentially from one of the propellant tanks, such as the propellant tank closer to the center of mass, to thereby tend to shift the center of mass toward the thrust axis in the case of CM offset, or in a direction to compen- sate for the unwanted torque in other cases. Referring to FIGURE 2, tank 210a would be pressurized to a higher pres- sure than tank 210b, so that propellant would be preferentially drawn from propel- lant tank 210a during firing of thruster 24, thereby shifting center of mass 220 to the right, toward thrust axis 26. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007