Appeal No. 96-1999
Application 08/216,382
these reasons that the rejection of claims 1, 8 and 9 cannot
be sustained.
In summary, this panel of the board has reversed the
rejection of claims 1, 8, and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Hubert.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFER-
ENCES
)
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007