THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TOYOJI KANAZAWA, SHINGO ICHIKAWA,
HIROYUKI KANEKO, HISATARO WATADA,
and TOSHIBUMI WAKAYAMA
__________
Appeal No. 96-2404
Application 08/112,4461
__________
HEARD: Jun. 7, 1999
__________
Before GARRIS, OWENS, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the
examiner to allow claims 1 through 22 as amended subsequent to
1Application for patent filed August 26, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007