THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN GRINKUS
____________
Appeal No. 96-2905
Application No. 29/008,0761
____________
HEARD: October 15, 1997
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge and
CAROFF, MEISTER, JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS, HAIRSTON, STAAB,
FLEMING, PAK, NASE and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
Majority opinion by Administrative Patent Judge NASE.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge, concurring.
FLEMING and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges, dissenting.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
1Attorney Docket No. 02103/236001.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007