Appeal No. 96-2905
Application No. 29/008,076
This is in response to the appellant's request for
rehearing of our decision mailed December 23, 1997, wherein we2
affirmed the examiner's rejection of the appealed design claim
under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph.
We have carefully considered the arguments raised by the
appellant in the request for rehearing, however, those
arguments do not persuade us that our decision was in error in
any respect.
In the request, the appellant lists six points believed
to have been misapprehended or overlooked in rendering our
decision and other grounds upon which rehearing is sought. We
will address each of these points in the order they are
presented in the request.
First, the appellant argues that we overlooked or
misapprehended that the claim under appeal points out the
bounds between infringing and noninfringing conduct with
2Filed February 27, 1998.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007