Ex parte SHAW et al. - Page 1



                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                                                
                        for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                           Paper No. 31                                
                                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                             
                                                                                ____________                                                                                           
                                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                            
                                                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                           
                                                                                ____________                                                                                           
                                                Ex parte DANIEL C. SHAW and DONALD F. BUSH                                                                                             
                                                                                ____________                                                                                           
                                                                        Appeal No. 1996-3525                                                                                           
                                                                 Application No. 08/089,5951                                                                                           
                                                                                ____________                                                                                           
                                                                   HEARD:  February 9, 1999                                                                                            
                                                                                ____________                                                                                           
                     Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                  
                     NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                                


                                                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                           
                                This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                                                 
                     rejection of claims 1 through 3, 7, 10 and 11.  Claims 5, 6,                                                                                                      
                     8, 9 and 12 through 15 have been objected to as depending from                                                                                                    
                     a non-allowed claim.  Claims 16 through 26 have been withdrawn                                                                                                    


                                1Application for patent filed July 12, 1993. According to                                                                                              
                     the appellants, the application is a continuation of                                                                                                              
                     Application No. 07/822,201, filed January 17, 1992, now                                                                                                           
                     abandoned, which was a continuation-in-part of Application No.                                                                                                    
                     07/800,718, filed December 3, 1991, now abandoned, which was a                                                                                                    
                     continuation of Application No. 07/607,275, filed October 31,                                                                                                     
                     1990, now abandoned, which was a division of Application No.                                                                                                      
                     07/382,113, filed July 20, 1989, now U.S. Patent No.                                                                                                              
                     4,985,944.                                                                                                                                                        



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007