Appeal No. 96-3652 Application No. 08/348,820 obviousness is established by presenting evidence that the reference teachings would appear to be sufficient for one of ordinary skill in the relevant art having the references before him to make the proposed combination or other modification. See In re Lintner, 458 F.2d 1013, 1016, 173 USPQ 560, 562 (CCPA 1972). Furthermore, the conclusion that the claimed subject matter is prima facie obvious must be supported by evidence, such as shown by some objective teaching in the prior art or by knowledge generally available to one of ordinary skill in the art that would have led that individual to combine the relevant teachings of the references to arrive at the claimed invention. See In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1074, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988). The appealed claims call for a method for forming a silica-based barrier layer that includes the step of projecting a ternary gaseous mixture comprising a major portion of a neutral gas, a gaseous precursor of silicon and oxygen through a nozzle projection slit at atmospheric pressure transversely onto a heated glass surface located less than 15 mm away while causing relative movement between the 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007