Ex parte RIES et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1996-3659                                                        
          Application No. 08/237,484                                                  

               The rejection of claims 1 through 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
          as being unpatentable over Venkatesan in view of Bein is                    
          reversed.                                                                   
          The rejection of claims 1 through 9 under 35 U.S.C. §                       
          103 as being unpatentable over Boszormenyi in view of                       
          Venkatesan is reversed.                                                     
          The rejection of claims 10 through 18 under 35 U.S.C.                       
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Boszormenyi in view of                     
          Venkatesan is reversed.                                                     
          The rejection of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                       
          being anticipated by Bals is affirmed.                                      
          The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                           

















                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007