Ex parte MAHANT-SHETTI et al. - Page 3





          Application No. 08/176,867                                                  




                    Claims 1, 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103            
          as unpatentable over Basehore in view of Clapper.                           
                    Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          unpatentable over Basehore in view of Clapper and Conway.                   
                    Claims 6, 8, 9 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §            
          103 as unpatentable over Basehore in view of Clapper and Selviah.           


                    Claims 14-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
          unpatentable over Basehore in view of Clapper, Conway and Selviah.          
                    The respective positions of the examiner and the                  
          appellants with regard to the propriety of these rejections are             
          set forth in the examiner's final rejection and answer (Paper Nos.          
          5 and 9, respectively) and the appellants’ brief (Paper No. 8).             
          Appellants’ Invention                                                       


                    The invention determines the number of bits differing             
          between two multibit words (Hamming distance) by converting bit             
          differences to currents which are summed.  The sum is compared to           
          reference currents to generate outputs.  Figure 2 illustrates               
          apparatus wherein bit differences from bit comparator 12 turn on            
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007