Application No. 08/176,867 nor any of the other references, shows or suggests any current comparisons as required by the third element of claim 1. With respect to Figure 1 of Clapper, it is urged that three inputs A, B and C drive emitter followers 16, 26 and 30 which, in turn, bias current sources 32, 36 and 39 having common collectors. The collector currents generated in response to the A, B and C inputs are coupled to a –15 volt reference through resistor 34, and are thereby converted to a voltage at node E which is proportional to the sum of the three collector currents. This voltage level is then compared to three thresholded outputs which have different threshold voltages, and thereby produce the sum and carry voltage signals. Figure 3 shows the four possible voltage levels on node E and the resultant sum and carry outputs. This is a voltage level operation and only voltage comparisons are performed in the outputs. Because there is no teaching of current comparison, as in claim 1 and all of the other claims on appeal, it is urged that the claims are patentable over the prior art. The examiner admits that Basehore does not disclose current adders and comparators, and that instead Basehore utilizes digital computation. It is urged that Clapper discloses an adder which uses current generators and transistors to represent a 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007