THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEVEN K. HELLER
and ANDREW SHAW
____________
Appeal No. 96-3697
Application No.08/255,3041
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-
14, all the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a system for generating a
Application for patent filed June 7, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a1
continuation of Application 07/857,545, filed March 25, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007