Ex Parte CHALLAPALI et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1996-4091                                                        
          Application 08/167,394                                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection             
          of claims 1 through 4, all of the claims present in the applica-            
          tion.                                                                       
                    The invention is directed to a method and apparatus for           
          converting a digital high definition television signal which is             
          digitally compressed and contains coded data into a standard                
          television signal which is compressed and has coded data in                 
          another format.                                                             
                    Independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                     
                    1.  A method for transcoding a first group of                     
          macroblocks of a first digital television signal, to a co-sited             
          macroblock of second digital television signal, said method                 
          comprising the steps of:                                                    
                    a) deriving from each of said first group of                      
          macroblocks, corresponding HD macroblock information; and                   
                    b) deriving SD macroblock information for said co-sited           
          macroblock directly from said HD macroblock information so as to            
          form said second digital television signal.                                 
                    The reference relied on by the Examiner is:                       
          Ng                   5,262,854                   Nov. 16, 1993              


                    The Examiner objected to Appellants' specification                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for failing to provide an           
          enabling disclosure.  Claims 1 through 4 stand rejected under               


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007